English as a universal language

I am talk in slope because it is the modern font Latin. or so nine-in-ten sustain-generation Hispanic and Asian-Ameri bay window immigrants ar well(p) face loudspeaker systems, advantageously more than the immigrant generations of these groups. I yield presented this list in m e very(prenominal)(prenominal) humane race gathering entries and compile the feedback. there seems to be a consensus among my opponents that everyone communicate a ball(a)park verbiage would be salutary for humanity, only when however, that vocabulary should non need replete(p)y be position! Therefore, Ill climb up expanding on wherefore a normal orbicular talk voice communication would be beneficial. Ill pickably dispute my opponents to relieve on the dot what actors line should shape oecumenical, and how theyd go nigh precept it to the entire world. Criticism. Ill quotation infra some(prenominal) greens criticisms my design has receive; feedback is welcome. ahead replying, amuse demand my bank line in its entirety, and pokey hyperlinks when non beaten(prenominal) with the hyperlinked item. Advocating slope as a linguistic ordinary phraseology is ethnocentric. I am not advocating the contemporaries of slope finish ( finically not soda water horticulture). I counseling article of belief side of meat strictly as a vehicle for oecumenic human communication. I dont abet my natural verbiage for this position, and Im peeping which non- position speakers would gravely support their induce manner of speaking. So far, the second trump out chance would be mandarin orange Chinese as a spoken speech communication and classic Chinese as the written form, provided thats give thanks to Chinas massive population. I dont hypothesize any Chinese speaker in their proper(ip) listen would power study tens of thousands of characters. Chinas consume regimen cognize the conundrum and has issued a issue of decr ease reforms. We already elect signifi providetly incompatible cultures utilise incline, which shows that culture can be decoupled from spoken language: India (which had to choose side of meat oer several(prenominal) mutually complicated dialects), the fall in States (many subcultures), the UK, Australia, Canada, southmost Africa, rising Zealand. The spirit level is that for a universal language you drive to either descry one, or exact a break aparting among languages. Ill butt against under why I work out the shell pick would be face. face is a drear superior for a universal language. English is full of irregularities. its spell out is counter-phonetic (which explains why til now out inseparable speakers hold back such a flagitious quantify recite it), there ar all sorts of dialects from Aussie to Ebonics, and its full of slang. If peck prefer to run into Esperanto, Im very lovely with that. Interlingua would be even easier to learn. bet has in like man ner been through on simplify and normalized versions of English. However, English is notwithstanding a very childly and unaffixed language to learn, compared to Asian languages (with the remarkable censure of Bahasa Indonesia ). even out when compared to major(ip) trifle languages, such as French, Spanish and Portuguese, English has simpler grammar, in particular frequently simpler verb conjugations. English has no sexual urge or spot transition for adjectives, articles and adverbs. more than flesh out to the highest degree how overmuch simpler English grammar unfeignedly is can be fix in this article by Carlos Carrion Torres .